Time to Close the Gap: Is the PTAB Looking at Prosecution Histories in IPRs?
“The gap between the scope of review required under Phillips and that implemented by the Board plainly does the public a disservice. The public has a right to rely on the prosecution history in order to understand the scope of a patent’s issued claims.” If a recent decision denying institution of an inter partes review (IPR) is any indicator, the answer to the question above seems to be no, the Board does not routinely review a challenged patent’s prosecution history—even when the history includes a prior Board decision construing claim terms at issue in the IPR. In Apple Inc. v. Uniloc 2017 LLC, IPR2019-00753,...
Continue reading